Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery

  • Permalink Gallery

    Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Makes Sense for Patients and Their Providers

Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Makes Sense for Patients and Their Providers

Spine surgery has always been a relatively complex matter. It wasn’t long ago that patients needing a back or neck procedure had their surgery using an “open” technique. Over time, a myriad of procedures were refined thanks to advances in surgical instrumentation and techniques. Surgeons also now have a better understanding of anatomical structure as a result of advancing diagnostic imaging, cadaver training, and other tools. This understanding has elevated patient outcomes, particularly for spinal surgeries.

There is no question that minimally invasive spine surgery is advantageous for patients. The recovery period after surgery is typically shorter and more comfortable. With shorter incisions than open surgery, minimally invasive spine procedures have a lower risk of infection and blood loss. Today’s spine surgeon tends to be extraordinarily motivated to master minimally invasive surgical techniques and demonstrate proficiency that translates into successful outcomes. This is yet another testament to the validity of cadaver training. 

Minimally invasive spine surgery is not new. This area of medicine has been in an ongoing process of refinement for over half a century. The last few decades alone have brought significant advancements. With beginnings that included a small group of surgeons learning microsurgical techniques, minimally invasive procedural models have expanded exponentially throughout all of medicine, with one surgeon honing skills and passing them on to colleagues through formal training events. 

The value of minimally invasive surgical techniques is not limited to patients, though that is the ultimate goal. Surgeons also experience fewer issues when modern surgical methods are utilized. MISS spares tissue and nerves far better than open surgery while achieving the access that is necessary for a safe and effective spine surgery. Spinal surgeons must navigate a significant amount of anatomy, and today’s […]

July 15th, 2021|Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery|Comments Off on Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Makes Sense for Patients and Their Providers|

How MISS Supports Optimal Patient Outcomes

Until recently, spine surgery was conducted in an “open” manner. Advances in surgical technique and instrumentation have enabled more surgeons to refine the performance of a myriad of procedures. Advances in imaging and other diagnostic tools have led to a greater understanding of anatomical structure, which is crucial to patient outcomes, particularly in the area of spinal surgery. In combination, these advances have culminated in the increased awareness, interest, and performance of minimally invasive spinal surgery procedures.

The value to patients is clear. A minimally invasive surgery, as opposed to open surgery, support a much faster and more comfortable recovery. There are less blood loss and a much lower risk of infection during a minimally invasive surgery due to the inconsequential nature of incisions. Spinal specialists want to be experts in the performance of minimally invasive techniques; and they want to confidently demonstrate this expertise to their patients, which is why bioskills training is so important.

Minimally invasive spine surgery has been in a constant state of development since the 1960s, though the last few decades have been a time of significant improvement. Starting with a small group of surgeons who developed microsurgical techniques, the use of minimally invasive procedures has continued to expand, with each surgeon at the forefront of new techniques thoroughly testing them and then passing them on to others.

Minimally invasive surgical techniques have resolved one of the major issues faced by spinal surgeons: how to minimize tissue and nerve damage to the greatest degree while obtaining access to a relatively small part of the spinal column. There is a significant amount of anatomy in the way, but to cut and open a wide area of tissue would be to create inherent risk. […]